Ftdi Usb I2c Software

Dec 21, 2017 - UMFT200XD-01 is based on FTDI's FT200XD chipset and UMFT201XB-01 is based on FTDI's FT201XQ. This is USB-I2C master only device.

What are the results using the FDTI chip as a I2C peripheral? The same as you pehaps I was very curious about the performance using it from the USB driver and DLL. To get a good idea I wrote some higher level functions that use the API the make things easier accessing the PCA device. I divided it into: - Init - Read ADBUS interrupt line - Read byte(s) from PCA - Write bytes(s) to PCA Basically the init function put the PCA in the correct mode and initialize the FTDI chip properly regarding the speed. I used 1Mhz speed as the PCA can handle this fast I2C speed but this will not be a bottleneck as we'll see. To initialize it took 350ms. This sounds big and actually it's but this is only done ones at the start of the program and is not that important.

Than I started to poll on the INT line: read int time: 1 ms status: ef read int time: 3 ms status: ef read int time: 1 ms status: ef read int time: 3 ms status: ef As you can see an average of 2ms. This was after I changed the LatencyTime parameter of the FTDI from 16ms to 2ms which is the minimum. If you don't do that the fastest result you get is 16ms!

I continued with the read of 5 consequent bytes from the PCA and I got ca 22ms. This is a bit disappointed. I did the same writing 5 bytes and this was a bit better ca 16ms. To deduce the overhead per byte I wrote a command to read/write just one byte: read pca time: 9 ms status: ff read pca time: 9 ms status: ff write pca time: 8 ms write pca time: 8 ms So the fasted time in read or write to an external I2C device using the USB FTDI chip is ca 10ms. So this had a 2ms overhead for any extra byte to read or send. I see a few reasons for these poor performance results: 1. The USB overhead for small data packets 2.

Minimum FTDI latency is 2ms 3. High level MPSSE command structure (atomic) I checked the DLL code and most of the functions were well written and can not be optimized. However in the read cycle this can be optimized a little bit but not worth to try and see much differences I think. Although the performance is not that fantastic, this design let you interface a PC platform (linux,windows,CE,mac) with any customized external board that uses a I2C bus as communication. And it's a very cheap and powerful solution. You can make your programs on your favourite platform without using embedded micro controllers.

Use the power of that platform to interact with other high level software components without having the limitations of embedded boards. So anyone that have to work with some extended I2C based device can make use of this chip. Be ware this only counts for the latest series of FTDI eg 2232C or D. One of the drawbacks I see is that to serve systems running 24/7 using this solution, you have to let a PC running too and that's may be a kind of overkill. In that case it's better to have a small embedded system with very low power consumption or at least a PC platform without sensitive mechanical parts like fans or hard drives.

So the question still remains for me if I'm going to use this as my domotic server system or not. I keep you posted on in this blog. In my next I'll present the overall setup with a nice picture of the components I used. As you can see on the left this is the final design. It's a try out to investigate the possibilities of the FTDI 2232D chip. The objective was using the FTDI provided DLLs and interface my IO board via I2C. The first tests were perfect!

The chip in MPSSE mode let you communicate via I2C just by calling a few DLL API calls. But soon I noticed that this mode had some drawbacks. In de specifications of the chip nothing is telling you that if you use the MPSSE mode the gpios of the ADBUS and ACBUS are not available! As my OE and INT of the IO board were connected using these gpio pins, the design became useless. Of course I tried to write to FTDI support but they are not that fast in response.

Here are some FTDI answers. Is it possible to have the source code of the I2C DLL? Ans: Sure attached.

Naruto The Movie 5 'Bonds' Indonesia Subtitle Fauzan Ryuzaki. Boruto episode 65 sub indo 'Ayah dan Anak' [FULL SCREEN]. Naruto the Movie Road to Ninja Sub Indo - Duration. Naruto The Movie 5 'Bonds' Indonesia Subtitle. Naruto The Movie 5 'Bonds' Indonesia Subtitle. Skip navigation Sign in. Naruto vs Sasuke (Full Fight. Tulisan ini dipublikasikan di Action, Comedy, Martial Arts, Shounen, Super Power Rating dan tag Anime Download, Anime Download Movie, NARUTO, Naruto Movie, Naruto Movie 5, Naruto Shippuden Movie, Naruto Shippuden Movie 2, Naruto Shippuden The Movie 2: Bonds Subtitle Indonesia. Naruto Movie Berdurasi 1 - 2 Jam dengan Subtitle Berbahasa Indonesia NB: Semua Link sudah diperbaharui,jika ada yang Expired atau terjadi masalah lain dalam mendownload,silahkankomentar disini,laporkan di Chat Box,atau Laporkan ke FanPage kami yang ada disebelah kanan layar Blog ini. Download Naruto The Movie 1 - 9 Subtitle Indonesia Complete.

At last they attached the source code of the DLL which was a good thing. Nevertheless I wrote some final mail to point out my situation and what I really need for my design: First of all thanks for your quick answer and attaching the source code. Bad news of course to hear that the GPIOs can not be combined together with the MPSSE mode. It's not quit clear to me if the behaviour comes from using the DLL or it's inherent on the MPSSE mode itself. (not checked the code in detail yet) But one thing that FTDI definitly must do is add some remark in the specification. The pdf as is now only shows following notes in the column MPSSE: **Note 4: MPSSE is Channel A only.

**Note 8: SI/WU is not available in these modes. Download full version. This should be extended with a dedicated note like 'GPIOs not available.' In case it's inherent on MPSSE mode and if the cause is due to the DLL in software this can be noted in the API pdf as such. However my design issue remains and I want to find a solution. The purpose is to have 8 GPIOs available not at the same time when I need the I2C functionality.

Dec 21, 2017 - UMFT200XD-01 is based on FTDI's FT200XD chipset and UMFT201XB-01 is based on FTDI's FT201XQ. This is USB-I2C master only device.

What are the results using the FDTI chip as a I2C peripheral? The same as you pehaps I was very curious about the performance using it from the USB driver and DLL. To get a good idea I wrote some higher level functions that use the API the make things easier accessing the PCA device. I divided it into: - Init - Read ADBUS interrupt line - Read byte(s) from PCA - Write bytes(s) to PCA Basically the init function put the PCA in the correct mode and initialize the FTDI chip properly regarding the speed. I used 1Mhz speed as the PCA can handle this fast I2C speed but this will not be a bottleneck as we'll see. To initialize it took 350ms. This sounds big and actually it's but this is only done ones at the start of the program and is not that important.

Than I started to poll on the INT line: read int time: 1 ms status: ef read int time: 3 ms status: ef read int time: 1 ms status: ef read int time: 3 ms status: ef As you can see an average of 2ms. This was after I changed the LatencyTime parameter of the FTDI from 16ms to 2ms which is the minimum. If you don't do that the fastest result you get is 16ms!

I continued with the read of 5 consequent bytes from the PCA and I got ca 22ms. This is a bit disappointed. I did the same writing 5 bytes and this was a bit better ca 16ms. To deduce the overhead per byte I wrote a command to read/write just one byte: read pca time: 9 ms status: ff read pca time: 9 ms status: ff write pca time: 8 ms write pca time: 8 ms So the fasted time in read or write to an external I2C device using the USB FTDI chip is ca 10ms. So this had a 2ms overhead for any extra byte to read or send. I see a few reasons for these poor performance results: 1. The USB overhead for small data packets 2.

Minimum FTDI latency is 2ms 3. High level MPSSE command structure (atomic) I checked the DLL code and most of the functions were well written and can not be optimized. However in the read cycle this can be optimized a little bit but not worth to try and see much differences I think. Although the performance is not that fantastic, this design let you interface a PC platform (linux,windows,CE,mac) with any customized external board that uses a I2C bus as communication. And it's a very cheap and powerful solution. You can make your programs on your favourite platform without using embedded micro controllers.

Use the power of that platform to interact with other high level software components without having the limitations of embedded boards. So anyone that have to work with some extended I2C based device can make use of this chip. Be ware this only counts for the latest series of FTDI eg 2232C or D. One of the drawbacks I see is that to serve systems running 24/7 using this solution, you have to let a PC running too and that's may be a kind of overkill. In that case it's better to have a small embedded system with very low power consumption or at least a PC platform without sensitive mechanical parts like fans or hard drives.

So the question still remains for me if I'm going to use this as my domotic server system or not. I keep you posted on in this blog. In my next I'll present the overall setup with a nice picture of the components I used. As you can see on the left this is the final design. It's a try out to investigate the possibilities of the FTDI 2232D chip. The objective was using the FTDI provided DLLs and interface my IO board via I2C. The first tests were perfect!

The chip in MPSSE mode let you communicate via I2C just by calling a few DLL API calls. But soon I noticed that this mode had some drawbacks. In de specifications of the chip nothing is telling you that if you use the MPSSE mode the gpios of the ADBUS and ACBUS are not available! As my OE and INT of the IO board were connected using these gpio pins, the design became useless. Of course I tried to write to FTDI support but they are not that fast in response.

Here are some FTDI answers. Is it possible to have the source code of the I2C DLL? Ans: Sure attached.

Naruto The Movie 5 'Bonds' Indonesia Subtitle Fauzan Ryuzaki. Boruto episode 65 sub indo 'Ayah dan Anak' [FULL SCREEN]. Naruto the Movie Road to Ninja Sub Indo - Duration. Naruto The Movie 5 'Bonds' Indonesia Subtitle. Naruto The Movie 5 'Bonds' Indonesia Subtitle. Skip navigation Sign in. Naruto vs Sasuke (Full Fight. Tulisan ini dipublikasikan di Action, Comedy, Martial Arts, Shounen, Super Power Rating dan tag Anime Download, Anime Download Movie, NARUTO, Naruto Movie, Naruto Movie 5, Naruto Shippuden Movie, Naruto Shippuden Movie 2, Naruto Shippuden The Movie 2: Bonds Subtitle Indonesia. Naruto Movie Berdurasi 1 - 2 Jam dengan Subtitle Berbahasa Indonesia NB: Semua Link sudah diperbaharui,jika ada yang Expired atau terjadi masalah lain dalam mendownload,silahkankomentar disini,laporkan di Chat Box,atau Laporkan ke FanPage kami yang ada disebelah kanan layar Blog ini. Download Naruto The Movie 1 - 9 Subtitle Indonesia Complete.

At last they attached the source code of the DLL which was a good thing. Nevertheless I wrote some final mail to point out my situation and what I really need for my design: First of all thanks for your quick answer and attaching the source code. Bad news of course to hear that the GPIOs can not be combined together with the MPSSE mode. It's not quit clear to me if the behaviour comes from using the DLL or it's inherent on the MPSSE mode itself. (not checked the code in detail yet) But one thing that FTDI definitly must do is add some remark in the specification. The pdf as is now only shows following notes in the column MPSSE: **Note 4: MPSSE is Channel A only.

**Note 8: SI/WU is not available in these modes. Download full version. This should be extended with a dedicated note like 'GPIOs not available.' In case it's inherent on MPSSE mode and if the cause is due to the DLL in software this can be noted in the API pdf as such. However my design issue remains and I want to find a solution. The purpose is to have 8 GPIOs available not at the same time when I need the I2C functionality.